![]() ![]() In Reactor A for both positive and negative mode data, this analysis showed that the MW2 method gave the largest number of differentially abundant LC-MS features (including for the subset with putative compound identifications) among different stages during the EBPR cycle, followed by MW1, with the other solvent groups returning smaller numbers of differentially abundant features, or none in the case of MCW_C (Table 3 and Figure S8). examine the extent of differential abundance within each extraction solvent method, we applied ANOVA to identify LC-MS features that were differentially abundant between stages of the EBPR cycle in the case of Reactor A, or those that were differentially abundant between stages and/or between compartments (extracellular or intracellular) in the case of Reactor B (see Section 4). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |